Last 12 weeks · 0 commits
2 of 6 standards met
We have a set of micro benchmarks which we compare using . This would be an example benchmark result: Unfortunately, the order of the groups is lexically sorted (I believe?), but it would be way nicer for it to be human-readable numerically sorted: (this output was created using plus manual fixing of the first two lines).
Hi @BurntSushi, I'd like for criterion to support this style of workflow but I'm not sure how to go about it. I see a few different options: 1. Write a specification for the data format and let external tools parse it on their own. 2. Write a library for loading and storing baselines. 3. Merge into or . I'm leaning towards option 2. What are your thoughts? Also, is there a better name for a collection of benchmark results than "baseline"?
Hi @BurntSushi Thanks for . I just was going through the code and was wondering what will happen in case of big differences in nanoseconds. And as you see bellow it gets broken a bit. Is this something which should be addressed? (I mean at the end of the day the consistency of the data is still correct) The example uses in one column. Thanks. Take care.
Repository: BurntSushi/critcmp. Description: A command line tool for comparing benchmarks run by Criterion. Stars: 265, Forks: 21. Primary language: Rust. Languages: Rust (100%). License: Unlicense. Open PRs: 2, open issues: 5. Last activity: 1y ago. Community health: 42%. Top contributors: BurntSushi, atouchet, hkratz, tko, sharksforarms.